-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 30/10/12 03:45 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Dne Út 30. října 2012 20:24:26, Michał Górny napsal(a): >> On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:30:16 -0700 >> >> Diego Elio Pettenò <flamee...@flameeyes.eu> wrote:
>> >>> So given that it's a PITA for the maintainers, a PITA for the >>> users, eselect boost has been shown to be a bad idea and so on >>> ... can we just go back to just install it and that's about >>> it? >> >> How are you going to solve the issue of a lot of packages being >> broken with new boost versions? Are you volunteering to keep >> fixing them with each release? > > Simple, as any other lib, depend on older version and possibly port > it forward. If that does not work then mask and wipe. Life goes > on. > If we un-slot boost there won't be an 'older' version available on users systems anymore; when the new boost hits ~arch and then stable, all ~arch / stable rdeps will -need- to build against that version of boost, period (or be lastrite'd as ssuominen suggested) .... unless i'm missing your meaning here? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iF4EAREIAAYFAlCQMOQACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCGAwEAi1Oe50EPF87hI11hUVkovcvM xs/DOoDXKkuxArfdKjQA/0AFMkOhITgb1QcSwisO6jGREewZgUt/XKNnoRP2bx7q =u7CM -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
