On Monday 30 April 2012 22:57:29 Walter Dnes wrote: > The one thing I'm leary of is moving the actual app from /bin/busybox > to /ginit. IANACP (I Am Not A C Programmer), let alone a developer, so > I may be missing something. Is there an overwhelming reason to depart > from the standard location for busybox? Why move the binary to /ginit,
please read the rest of my e-mail. you snipped the part that explained why. > rather than make a symlink from /bin/busybox to /ginit? i think you have this reversed. the current ebuild does symlink /bin/busybox to /ginit. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
