On Monday 30 April 2012 12:32:35 Matt Turner wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote: > >> doing it wrong. I don't like how Google develops Android in the dark, > >> or that they bundle 1GB of third-party stuff in their Chromium source > >> and distribute a favored binary-only derivative. > > > > err, they distribute a Chromium source tarball, and their build system > > includes flags to use the system versions of those bundled libs if you so > > choose. i think this is a perfectly fine compromise. > > It looks like chromium-20.0.1115.1.ebuild removes 45 bundled > libraries
to be sure the system ones get used > and still has TODOs in place to use the system's ffmpeg, > hunspell, (Open?)SSL, SQLite, and libvpx. it's on going work :). ffmpeg/libvpx are a bit harder as Chromium syncs faster than they make releases i believe. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
