On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 08:55:49 -0700 Zac Medico <zmed...@gentoo.org> wrote: > I suppose that we could do it both ways. The repoman check would be > for people who want a practical approach that doesn't require all > ebuilds to be converted to EAPI 5, and your strict die approach would > be for people who want strictness and can afford to wait for the > relevant ebuilds to be converted to EAPI 5.
But there's no way the repoman check is going to give anything like reliable answers if you're involving eclasses... -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
