On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:43:06 +0200 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >>>>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > >> Did I get it right, you are thinking about a special EAPI only for > >> user patches? I'd say that the feature is not important enough to > >> justify that. > > > Didn't we have a few other cheap things lined up? > > Yes we do, and IMHO it would make much more sense if EAPI 5 would > include them. > > (And of course, there are still the two features that were omitted > from EAPI 4, namely slot-operator-deps and profile-iuse-injection.) Of course, if we take the 'quick EAPI 5 route', it won't include anything useful. In the meantime, do we have a complete list of candidates for EAPI 5? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
