On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 20:01:15 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Since we've managed to survive up to this point without such a
> > feature, I think it's worth the wait roll it into EAPI 5 and have a
> > clean solution that doesn't rely on package manager interaction with
> > eclasses. If we quickly draft an EAPI 5 spec, there's still have
> > time to have it approved at the next council meeting.
> 
> Did I get it right, you are thinking about a special EAPI only for
> user patches? I'd say that the feature is not important enough to
> justify that.

Didn't we have a few other cheap things lined up?

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to