On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 22:46:10 +0200 Tomáš Chvátal <scarab...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 0007 - I placed it into the conditionals to be clear what is > happening, what if there will be added another if without the push... Well, that part is not important, I can rollback it. It was mostly for the repack/prune part. > 0010 - 0011 - I was serious with getting crashes on some packages with > this approach (suprisingly i first really tried to make the eclass > backcompat as much as possible), did you get anyone else to ack this > thing? FWIW it is like fetching new packages, I can agree that > dowloading whole qt or libreoffice can make someone sad, but it is > just few megs compared to the rest of your weekly world update. -> You > are introducing possibility to nicely fail without any simple > resolution why for almost no benefit. Even with 'git clone' approach? Could you point me to a particular test case or bug describing this thoroughly? -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
