On Sun, 2011-02-13 at 19:34 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 20:31:23 +0100 > Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Wouldn't be any shorter way to build all CAMERAS? We don't want to > > default to enabling all, with the new way of handling this, if CAMERAS > > is not set or is empty, nothing will be built but, if CAMERAS="*" > > shouldn't be used, what should we use instead of having to manually > > add all of them to make.conf (from a user point of view) > > Why not specify all the CAMERAS you know about as being on by default in > the profile? Users who care enough can override this with an explicit > subset. >
If rest of gnome team agrees, I think we could go with, but I still fail to see what is the "technical" problem on allowing CAMERAS="*" to be used :-|
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
