On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Panagiotis Christopoulos <pchr...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 11:20 Mon 15 Nov , Christian Faulhammer wrote: >> I don't want to stop you, but you are relatively new to the "real" >> keywording business. amd64 at a point had over 30 members and could >> not work on the backlog in a timely manner. Think about >> ... > > I completely agree. I don't know even what's the status of ~mips in the > main tree. It would be better, I believe, to start working on the ~mips > system/world set, then start stabilizing only toolchain and/or > @base-system packages. Please don't start keywording/stabilizing random > packages without taking into *serious* consideration what Christian > wrote. I was here when we dropped the stable mips keyword, I don't want > to see it happening again.
I'm not planning an ad-hoc at-random stabilization/keywording spree. I'd just like to have a stable and tested base system.
