On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:37:51 -0500
Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:28 PM, Ryan Hill <dirtye...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:00:00 -0500
> > Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Should we target package versions that aren't stabilized on other
> >> architectures yet, so that we'll have an extended testing period
> >> before they'll come up for stabilization? That is, can I plan to make
> >> gcc-4.5.1 or something the first restabilized version of gcc, go ahead
> >> and begin testing it, and be ready for stabilization when toolchain
> >> requests it?
> >
> > I'd work on getting it ~mips before you think about stabilizing. ;)  Last
> > report I got it doesn't build.
> 
> I've been using gcc-4.5.1 for the last two weeks or so. :)
> 
> Should I add a ~mips keyword?

Kumba told me about some weird behavior he saw where the stage 2 and 3
comparison failed and the build restarted from scratch again and got into an
endless loop.  Maybe a hardware problem?

If you want to keyword 4.5.1 then you'll need to keyword dev-libs/mpc (bug
#279851) and either keyword dev-libs/cloog-ppl or mask the graphite USE flag
in your profiles (bug #269088).


-- 
fonts, gcc-porting,                  it makes no sense how it makes no sense
toolchain, wxwidgets                           but i'll take it free anytime
@ gentoo.org                EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to