Ben de Groot wrote:
On 12 April 2010 15:22, Arun Raghavan<ford_pref...@gentoo.org> wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse<george.pro...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse<george.pro...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong.
Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help
Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habit of Apple-like
litigation when trying to protect it's logo.
I think the argument is that the wiki is not always accurate, and if
perceived as the official documentation, can put is in bad light.
There is *always* a chance of that, official or otherwise
Which the Wiki team should really be addressing before making a
world-editable wiki.
If you're talking about the offical wiki, we are addressing that
problem. If you are talking about the unofficial one, I can only
agree.
Cheers,
Just to add two cents worth. I rarely, very rarely, go to the
"unofficial" Gentoo wiki. To put it simply, its not supported by the
Gentoo organization itself. When it comes to my system, I want people
that I know use Gentoo and understand how it works or that the info is
from the official Gentoo Docs.
I may be able to contribute to the official Gentoo wiki when the need
arises but I doubt I would ever do that on the current unofficial wiki.
Just my two cents worth for the day. Back to my hole.
Dale
:-) :-)
