On 12 April 2010 15:22, Arun Raghavan <ford_pref...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 12 April 2010 18:49, George Prowse <george.pro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote: >>> >>> On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse<george.pro...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> [...] >>>> >>>> If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong. >>>> Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help >>>> Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habit of Apple-like >>>> litigation when trying to protect it's logo. >>> >>> I think the argument is that the wiki is not always accurate, and if >>> perceived as the official documentation, can put is in bad light. >>> >> There is *always* a chance of that, official or otherwise > > Which the Wiki team should really be addressing before making a > world-editable wiki.
If you're talking about the offical wiki, we are addressing that problem. If you are talking about the unofficial one, I can only agree. Cheers, -- Ben de Groot Gentoo Qt project lead developer Gentoo Wiki project lead
