On 12/04/2010 14:17, Arun Raghavan wrote:
On 12 April 2010 18:43, George Prowse<george.pro...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
If you are arguing that the name is ambiguous then I think you are wrong.
Gentoo knows about the unofficial wiki and knows it's mission is to help
Gentoo and not to hinder it. Gentoo hardly makes a habit of Apple-like
litigation when trying to protect it's logo.
I think the argument is that the wiki is not always accurate, and if
perceived as the official documentation, can put is in bad light.
There is *always* a chance of that, official or otherwise
