On Monday 09 November 2009 21:16:28 Mike Frysinger wrote: > oh muffin ! get over it already. either do it right or stop doing it.
perl? That's how you want to handle things? Great. I think we can agree that that strategy doesn't work. > > You should understand one thing: I don't care at all about most packages. > then let them die. Not an option. I refuse to sabotage the best distro in the world. > > (Btw, I wonder how many bugs glibc-2.11 will bring. We'll just let users > > discover them. I love that QA!) > > hmm, let's see, one package that was already broken under other C libraries > broke under glibc-2.11. and it's already been fixed. of course, if you'd > simply used bugzilla's search function, you wouldnt have to rhetorically > wonder aloud. So you actually built all packages against it? Awesome. I thought flameeyes and the sabayon people were the only one doing that at the moment. And talking about glibc ... For 2.11 you didn't even test if all patches apply (bug #292139) and maybe forgot to upload a patch (#292223) Plus a few bugs (hello simple bugzilla search function!) that I can't comment on yet as they might be user error. So please, do not try to talk to me about QA when you can't even handle simple things without error yourself. Especially on critical system packages. Let's just agree that things aren't perfect and when we discuss this topic next time - maybe in a year - we want things to be better. Bye, Patrick
