On Sunday 08 November 2009 14:46:34 Thomas Sachau wrote: > Mike Frysinger schrieb: > > On Sunday 08 November 2009 13:10:34 Patrick Lauer wrote: > >> On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote: > >>> В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет: > >>>> And because I'm a lazy > >>>> > >>>> I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just > >>>> fix it instead > >>> > >>> Do you mean that whatever you commit to the tree is not your > >>> responsibility? Sorry but it's your job. > >> > >> I make things work. Cosmetics are quite low on my list of priorities. > >> Feel free to fix such things. > >> All "my" packages are free for all to bump, fix and extend, as long as > >> whoever touched it is willing to fix any issues that happen from it. > > > > using this definition of "correct" (the package installs w/out failure > > and it seems to work), there is a lot of crap that could be in the tree. > > that doesnt mean the ebuild should be in the tree. this kind of work and > > opinion belongs in sunrise, not the main tree. we dont have a QA team to > > fix installed packages; they're here to maintain the *quality* of the > > tree. > > Please stop such comments. Sunrise really isnt a place, where you can drop > anything in without any quality check. Join the sunrise team, do our work > for some months, then tell me, where it lacks quality checks or anything > else.
you misinterpreted my post. sunrise has built in processes to get the quality up past crap. -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
