On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 04:48:56 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfre...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > There was a change in wording to better convey the original intent. > > There was no change in behaviour. > > There was a change in behavior of 'nonfatal > eclass_function_which_sometimes_calls_die'.
No there wasn't. The behaviour specified by PMS both before and after the patch remains exactly the same. The only thing the patch did was make the wording much clearer, so people can no longer make the (perfectly understandble) misinterpretation of the intent that you have made. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
