2009-08-22 00:51:14 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): > On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:40:04 +0200 > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfre...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > I would like to also notice that (not yet approved by Council) > > definition of nonfatal() in PMS was recently drastically changed > > without proper discussion with developers of other package managers. > > [1] was sent about 20 minutes after discussion about nonfatal() > > started in #gentoo-portage in about 2009-08-06 19:45 UTC. (I'm > > attaching IRC log from #gentoo-portage (in UTC+02 timezone).) I think > > that such drastic changes should be first discussed on gentoo-dev > > mailing list. > > There was no change to the definition of nonfatal. There was a change regardless of what you think.
> There was a clarification of the wording after it became clear that there > was room to misinterpret the intent of the original wording, and it went > through the usual Council-mandated process for such a change. This sentence contradicts your first sentence. Additionally you had deceived Christian Faulhammer by not presenting negative consequences of your patch and your interpretation of original wording of definition of nonfatal(). -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
