2009-08-22 01:43:54 Ciaran McCreesh napisaĆ(a): > On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:39:41 +0200 > Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfre...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > > There was a clarification of the wording after it became clear > > > > > that there was room to misinterpret the intent of the original > > > > > wording, and it went through the usual Council-mandated process > > > > > for such a change. > > > > > > > > This sentence contradicts your first sentence. > > > > > > No, it doesn't. > > > > "it went through the usual Council-mandated process for such a > > change" clearly contradicts "There was no change". > > There was a change in wording to better convey the original intent. > There was no change in behaviour.
There was a change in behavior of 'nonfatal eclass_function_which_sometimes_calls_die'. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.