2009-08-22 01:43:54 Ciaran McCreesh napisaƂ(a):
> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:39:41 +0200
> Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfre...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > > > > There was a clarification of the wording after it became clear
> > > > > that there was room to misinterpret the intent of the original
> > > > > wording, and it went through the usual Council-mandated process
> > > > > for such a change.
> > > > 
> > > > This sentence contradicts your first sentence.
> > > 
> > > No, it doesn't.
> > 
> > "it went through the usual Council-mandated process for such a
> > change" clearly contradicts "There was no change".
> 
> There was a change in wording to better convey the original intent.
> There was no change in behaviour.

There was a change in behavior of 'nonfatal 
eclass_function_which_sometimes_calls_die'.

-- 
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to