On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 22:22:54 +0200 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfre...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> 2009-08-22 21:39:47 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): > > On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:54:22 +0100 > > AllenJB <gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk> wrote: > > > Could there be room for "fast track" EAPI's to be considered on some > > > occasions - eg. in this case an EAPI-2.1 which is simply EAPI-2 with > > > the "package.* as directory in profiles" feature included? > > > > It's a possibility, since it's zero cost for Portage and an easy one > > to word into the specification. > > > > Another possibly nicer option would be to add the feature into EAPI 3. > > However, if we're considering this, we'd have to be absolutely totally > > clear that this isn't a call to open up EAPI 3 for yet more changes. > > EAPI=3 can be opened also for other changes trivial to implement (e.g. > allowing > bash-4.0 features). > That's exactly the 'yet more changes' we're trying to avoid. -- fonts, Character is what you are in the dark. gcc-porting, wxwidgets @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0662
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
