2009-08-22 21:39:47 Ciaran McCreesh napisał(a): > On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:54:22 +0100 > AllenJB <gentoo-li...@allenjb.me.uk> wrote: > > Could there be room for "fast track" EAPI's to be considered on some > > occasions - eg. in this case an EAPI-2.1 which is simply EAPI-2 with > > the "package.* as directory in profiles" feature included? > > It's a possibility, since it's zero cost for Portage and an easy one > to word into the specification. > > Another possibly nicer option would be to add the feature into EAPI 3. > However, if we're considering this, we'd have to be absolutely totally > clear that this isn't a call to open up EAPI 3 for yet more changes.
EAPI=3 can be opened also for other changes trivial to implement (e.g. allowing bash-4.0 features). -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
