-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 28 May 2009 20:42:30 +0100 Roy Bamford <neddyseag...@gentoo.org> wrote: > I don't see any objective measurements of performace in GLEP 55 > either. perhaps you could point me to a version and pargraph in GLEP > that details these benchmarks ?
It's not a question of benchmarks. It's a question of being slower by design. Allow me to explain: If GLEP 55 were to include benchmarks, they would be dismissed as "well we can make that code faster", which would be missing the point -- that it's a design penalty regardless of implementation. - -- Ciaran McCreesh -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoe6+kACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGqbwCg5Ye1CC5V+WjQ1nArN/eM1hpR 3qwAniS95KnP7FBbnbUiEVJnO5LLIXgF =FFMi -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
