-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2009.05.28 20:26, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [snip]
> > I think I have pointed you a few times at objective statements > > disagreeing with your subjective opinion. I hate repeating myself. > > And yet you keep ignoring the part where GLEP 55 demonstrates > objectively that the extension solution is better than the > alternatives. > > -- > Ciaran McCreesh > Ciaran, I don't see any objective measurements of performace in GLEP 55 either. perhaps you could point me to a version and pargraph in GLEP that details these benchmarks ? Its possible I'm looking at an old version. - -- Regards, Roy Bamford (NeddySeagoon) a member of gentoo-ops forum-mods treecleaners trustees -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkoe6SsACgkQTE4/y7nJvastiACdGB9T5AxloneQVrcY34liSvIf 5BkAoLQwpuLOw+ueGMrmecYAoPk8AsYn =gF09 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
