Petteri Räty demis ki:: > Michael Hammer wrote: >> * Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081112 00:46]: >>> What are others feelings on this? >> I like the idea! >> >>> What issues do you see with having a wiki? >> Pages of poor quality with wrong informations. >> >>> Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us having a >>> wiki? >> We should develop some kind of review process and at least the >> possiblity to lock and hide pages of poor quality. In the most cases >> the howtos are related to some herds. What if we have a "reviewed >> section" where herds can approve pages and user can be sure that the >> infos provided have a minimum of quality. >> >> g, mueli >> > > We already have a reviewed section. It's called GDP. > > Regards, > Petteri >
The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which can become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers. -- Gokdeniz Karadag
