* Gokdeniz Karadag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081112 13:06]: > Petteri Räty demis ki:: > > Michael Hammer wrote: > > We should develop some kind of review process and at least the > > possiblity to lock and hide pages of poor quality. In the most cases > > the howtos are related to some herds. What if we have a "reviewed > > section" where herds can approve pages and user can be sure that the > > infos provided have a minimum of quality. > > > > We already have a reviewed section. It's called GDP.
You're fully right! The GDP can therefore be the reviewed sections where documents from the wiki are transfered to. > The wiki can be a staging ground for user contributed documents, which can > become part of official docs after a review and cleanup by developers. That's the way I intended my proposal. As some kind of early state GDP documents. It's an unwritten fact that user are willing to contribute to wiki systems - but I've never received an xml file for our GDP written by a user ;) ... The wiki can be the place to develop new howtos by disburding the devs - IMHO. g, mueli -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Michael Hammer | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Graz, AT Gentoo Developer (Kerberos) | http://www.michael-hammer.at
pgpXImZvVf3Nc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
