On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 15:29:00 +0200 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > Which of the issues I listed needs to be addressed for the scm > > proposal? > > At least the upstream server load.
-scm doesn't attempt to use upstream to obtain any information. Upstream is only contacted when people install or reinstall packages, the same as for -9999 versions currently. > Other people seem to think it's feasible Jumping to that conclusion from such a vague proposal suggests that not much thought has gone into thinking that... > I think my proposal nicer and giving some value for the effort of > implementing it And I think it's not even far enough to be called a proposal, and we can't sensibly discuss any of it until it is. > -scm adds a some work to do with undefined features at best. -scm is trivial. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
