On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 14:27:22 +0200 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Many of them applies as well to the alternative proposal, I wonder > how you could say we, council, had to vote the other proposal given > such (and other) issues were open.
No they don't. The alternative proposal is deliberately simple enough to avoid those issues, whilst leaving the possibility of a larger solution that does have scm revision awareness open for the future. Does this mean you don't have answers then? -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
