On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:04:45 +0200 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It will be available once you trigger again the generation or if > >> you put a normal ebuild with such name. > > > > And what triggers said generation? > > I already replied in this thread, I guess the information is getting > too spread (and will be a pain put it back to the glep) =/ > > dev-zero pointed out that he would like to trigger the generation on > a timely basis, I wanted to trigger it on the sync event, others had > other opinion, so the best would be have it as separate phase and > trigger it from the maint application.
And none of those are even close to a reasonable, implementable idea. I'm getting the impression you really didn't think this through at all before mailing your proposal. I suggest you go back to the start, work out use cases, package manager interactions, how if at all ebuilds will need to be adapted and several examples. There's a big difference between a few vague ideas and the foundations for an implementable proposal. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
