On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 16:45:01 +0100 Marius Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is one significant problem not covered in the GLEP: If a package > contains an ebuild with a suffixed extension then all developers ever > working on that _package_ must use tools that can handle such ebuilds, > otherwise there will likely be problems regarding the Manifest > handling due to misclassifications of the file extension.
This isn't a new requirement introduced by the GLEP. That's already the case with EAPI things. -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
