On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 05:41:45 +0100 Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How does this chord with eclasses that set EAPI, instead of ebuilds? > Last I read was that EAPI-set-by-eclass was close to being ratified.
Read where? So far as I'm aware, everyone's been saying "don't set EAPI in an eclass". -- Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
