On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 14:26 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 12/12/07, Jan Kundrát <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > > As I told you before, I wont slot these two. > > > > Could you provide a link to reasons that lead you to this decision so > > that interested readers can make their own opinion? > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159623
Again while there might not be technical issues, what is not covered there in the bug is why rob users of a choice? Why make users mask a 2.0 version that's in the same slot as a 1.4.x version. Given that both will be actively maintained. If they are the same, why maintain 1.4.x at all? Kinda contradicts your justification and statements that gnupg-2 is a FULL replacement for gnupg-1. Plus your making Gentoo the ONLY distro where gnupg-1 and gnupg-2 can't be installed together. Just as upstream DESIGNED them. Nice one ;) And as I said then and now, good luck on stabilization ;) That's coming over a year after gnupg-2 was released. Can someone change the freaking broken record ;) -- William L. Thomson Jr. Gentoo/Java
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
