On K, 2007-12-12 at 07:07 +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 12/12/07, William L. Thomson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ...We will keep maintaining GnuPG-1 > > versions because they are very useful for small systems and for server > > based applications requiring only OpenPGP support." > > As I told you before, I wont slot these two.
I would like to have the option to have a smaller gnupg version in the shape of a well maintained upstream GnuPG-1 for any embedded or handheld devices I might acquire in the future, as I would only need OpenPGP support on such a limited disk and resource device. Please state a reason for not providing me, and many other users and developers alike, from such a choice. With no slotting I can bet on GnuPG-1 going away shortly after all architectures have stabled GnuPG-2, or is that not so and such users can mask >=GnuPG-1.9 and keep using a smaller version that perfectly fits their needs? If yes, why not slot it as is designed? Regards, Mart Raudsepp -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
