Mike Frysinger wrote: >> It's a shame xmlGawk got punted, it was the best project of its ilk >> imnsho. That other project[1] was deader than a dodo, vapier ;P > > that "other project" was started by the xmlGawk author as the replacement > of xmlGawk ... i know because we talked about it via e-mail :P > Heh, OK, my bad. :oops:
> i'm not going to make a core package dependent on an external patchset > again let alone one that requires linking against cruft in /usr ... it was > a pima Ah, I see - understood then. Thanks for sorting out the plugins flag for bash, btw. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
