On 9/8/07, Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > After much toiling, Infra has finally got the commits list active. > > Kudos to you all! > > What we now need is the installation of some kind of peer review. For > example add to the recruitment guide a recommendation to watch the > recruitee one mentored on the commits mailing list. > All other commits should be reviewed. Arch work is normally > done in a team and all teams watch each other, so that works quite > good, as keywords are done wrong far too often. > Any ideas about an efficient way to establish such a process? >
Can we see how often the list gets used first? Maybe things will improve in the next bit of time and we don't need any extra formal process. I have no problem adding to the guide that mentors should watch mentees commits (that is technically already required even though many do not). I'd rather have a bunch of people pointing out problems on commits in an ad-hoc manner than have 'All Commits Reviewed(TM)' ;) -Alec -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
