"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> After much toiling, Infra has finally got the commits list active.

 Kudos to you all!

What we now need is the installation of some kind of peer review.  For
example add to the recruitment guide a recommendation to watch the
recruitee one mentored on the commits mailing list.
 All other commits should be reviewed.  Arch work is normally
done in a team and all teams watch each other, so that works quite
good, as keywords are done wrong far too often.
 Any ideas about an efficient way to establish such a process? 

V-Li

-- 
Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
<URL:http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode

<URL:http://www.faulhammer.org/>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to