On Friday 17 August 2007, Alec Warner wrote: > On 8/17/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 17 August 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote: > > > On 13:40 Fri 17 Aug , Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > On Friday 17 August 2007, Hans de Graaff wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 18:43 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > > > > > > Also known as FEATURES=stricter. > > > > > > > > > > Unfortunately FEATURES=stricter stopped being really useful when it > > > > > started to die on bad programming practices QA messages. These > > > > > happen a lot and often are beyond our direct control because it may > > > > > not be easy to fix them or to convince upstream to fix them. I've > > > > > turned off stricter for this reason. > > > > > > > > i can make it more selective about which ones actually die ... > > > > > > Would be most useful if the things to die on were configurable, via > > > make.conf and possibly some files in /etc/portage/ where you could drop > > > in extra checks. > > > > what do you think of comment #14 in Bug 185567 ? > > > > i think that plus having hooks for all phase funcs ... > > +1 for pkg_maint
i was thinking more mnt_qa since the new phase will be like "maint_" or "mnt_" -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
