В Птн, 17/08/2007 в 13:18 -0700, Donnie Berkholz пишет:
> On 13:40 Fri 17 Aug     , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Friday 17 August 2007, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> > > Unfortunately FEATURES=stricter stopped being really useful
> > 
> > i can make it more selective about which ones actually die ...
> 
> Would be most useful if the things to die on were configurable, via make.conf
> and possibly some files in /etc/portage/ where you could drop in extra checks.

But is it good idea to let developers disable QA checks? Seems that it's
better to set QA checks in profile (arch team decision). Of course for
overlays only it'll be possible to redefine this.

Also speaking about "bad programming practice" seems that it's good to
be able to disable them on ebuild basis as some upstreams (e.g.
wireshark) are really interested in any compiler warnings and I report
such thing for them.

-- 
Peter.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Эта часть сообщения подписана цифровой подписью

Reply via email to