Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 10:29:29 +0200 > "Ioannis Aslanidis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > The real point is that bug-wranglers has lost over 50% of it's >> > effectiveness, again imo. jakub and spanky are the two main guys, >> > and it's not just the loss of jakub's prodigious work-rate, which >> > kept a lot bugs from even reaching devs, but the loss of his >> > influence on QA which is a complete disaster for gentoo. >> >> Add +1 to that.
<snip examples of bad behaviour> > ...does anyone want another few pages of that kind of thing? Devrel has > for once gotten something more or less right. Perhaps people should be > thanking them instead. > You're ignoring the point made about the amount of bugs Jakub kept away from devs, and the loss of his influence on QA. Quoting examples of his bad bahaviour doesn't change the fact that it is unacceptable for devrel to discuss his case without involving him. Please note this is not the same as discussing a complaint with the complainant, prior to discussing a dev's behaviour as a team. And no, I don't want pages more; I agree Jakub can be difficult. But at least he is difficult in the cause of achieving something real and positive for gentoo. And from the comments of others, *he gets the result*. It's not just me that thinks there haven't been any major b0rkages for nearly a year. Could it be that maybe, just maybe, the development process has actually worked /better/ since you were forcibly retired? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
