On Saturday 24 of March 2007 13:54:51 Michael Cummings wrote: > Ditto. Gentoo SoC projects need to be for Gentoo developed and sponsored > code/projects, not third party projects, no matter how much they would > whither and die without a gentoo core. There was an example of gentoo+gnome > integration (i think) in a previous email - that wouldn't be any more > appropriate. Unless there's the Gentoo Inc copyright in the header, it > isn't eligible in my opinion.
Anant really meant his mail: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GoogleSoC2007 - Revision-controlled home directories - we have the same idea for /etc - Python Basics Training Program - Math System for Children - Educational Apps - Tool for computer aided vocabulary learning - Gnome Media Center - G-Playah ... Also Google FAQ is worth reading: http://code.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=60291 Google seems to concern more about the FOSS community than the organizations' copyright in the header and imho that's a good thing. Gentoo is supposed to be a _mentoring_ organization, so the only question is whether Gentoo mentors are capable of mentoring a project or not. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
