Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [Sat Mar 24 2007, 11:38:45AM CDT] > On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:30:55 -0700 > Mike Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Grant Goodyear wrote: > > [snip] > > > PS. So, anybody have any actual technical comments about this > > > proposal? > > > > Yes. pioto's proposal is weak. lu_zero's counterproposal for > > developing a method of having a package manager agnostic "API" is > > much more useful than developing one language binding for one package > > manager.
Weird, I haven't received Mike's e-mail yet, although I got ciaranm's reply. In any event, I agree that lu_zero's idea would be preferable, if it could be implemented. I'm agnostic on that point at the moment, though, since it's hard to evaluate from lu_zero's brief sketch. I'd love to see a true detailed proposal. -g2boojum- -- Grant Goodyear Gentoo Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org/~g2boojum GPG Fingerprint: D706 9802 1663 DEF5 81B0 9573 A6DC 7152 E0F6 5B76
pgpslit9OK2hx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
