> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> >> Assuming you mean piotr, who is not pioto... The difference is, piotr's >> proposal is possible and doable within the timeframe, whereas lu_zero's >> sounds nice if you don't know anything about any of the package >> managers in question and can't be delivered within three months. > > I'd like to know your opinion about which are the pitfalls and the > issues since you are surely more informed than me on paludis and, to a > large degree, on portage internals. > > I assumed that for a foundation and a non exaustive converage the summer > would be more than enough. > > I'm more interested in a solid base than a complete and exaustive wrapper > =) > > lu > > PS: if the other project leaders would like to chip in I wouldn't be > offended ^^
I'd imagine portage lacks many of the things that would be wrapped (multiple repos being probably the big killer). -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
