On Fri, 2 Mar 2007 23:40:07 -0700 "Daniel Robbins"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/2/07, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PMS isn't Paludis. Paludis is an independent implementation (and the
> > only completely independent implementation) of PMS, and it's
> > necessary to have such an independent implementation to ensure that
> > PMS is a specification rather than a description of one particular
> > program.
> 
> PMS (and Paludis) are not hosted on Gentoo infrastructure and their
> development is not controlled by Gentoo, so they are both not Gentoo
> projects and thus fall outside the scope of Gentoo.

Paludis is not a Gentoo project. There is no disagreement there. This
discussion is about PMS, not Paludis.

As for "hosted on Gentoo infrastructure" and "controlled by
Gentoo", I'd like to point you to other projects that started out the
same way:

* eselect, a Gentoo project
* devmanual, a Gentoo project
* the Gentoo forums

Note that the first two also had initial non-public restricted
releases in the same style being used for PMS, and both ended up
benefiting greatly from it.

Also note that the traditional "open up discussions and source to
everyone straight away" alternative to eselect ended up being a hideous
XML mess that never got anywhere, at least in part due to its
development model.

-- 
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail                                : ciaranm at ciaranm.org
Web                                 : http://ciaranm.org/
Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to