On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 01:54:28 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 03 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > There is absolutely nothing Paludis specific in PMS. Nor is there > > anything Pkgcore specific, and the only Portage specific content is > > where we feel it's necessary to explain *why* something is a > > particular way when that why is down to a Portage quirk. > > that's fine ... that means we're back to figuring out the deadlines > for the project
Which brings us back to my initial question. Why is PMS considered so important that it might have a deadline imposed upon it by the Council? As far as I'm aware, nothing like this has been done before. Now, if there's a good reason for the Council imposing a deadline, there's a pretty decent chance that said deadline will be met. If the Council can justify why it needs PMS done in a hurry, PMS can end up being ready within a very short timeframe. If the Council can't justify the deadline, it will end up being done within a not so short timeframe, since all the PMS authors are working upon several things and won't make PMS top priority without good reason. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ Paludis, the secure package manager : http://paludis.pioto.org/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
