On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 17:29:55 +0000 Kurt Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I'm not trying to pick on Georgi, but can we please be realistic | about the true impact of this? So far, we've identified one | application (SpamAssassin) that incorrectly interprets a neutral SPF | record. As a result, it adds 1.1 to the overall SA score.
We've identified one very widely used application that interprets SPF records based upon how they're used by spammers rather than by how the specification says they should be interpreted. In this case, SA is entirely reasonable in its behaviour -- SPF makes the classic incorrect assumption that spammers won't abuse the system. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail : ciaranm at ciaranm.org Web : http://ciaranm.org/ as-needed is broken : http://ciaranm.org/show_post.pl?post_id=13
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
