On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 08:06 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: > Michael Cummings wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 17:48 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> - make sending gentoo.org mail via gentoo.org mail server > >> friendly/recommended > >> -mike > > > > Not an option for everyone without a lot of needless hoop jumping, like > > ssh port forwarding. Cox (rhyme it as you will), my cable provider, > > doesn't allow 25 to leave their network. To send mail, I *have* to relay > > through their mail servers. > > Then use port 587 like I do and it works perfectly fine. I have Cox and > don't have any problems sending gentoo mail through our system. > Knowing about port 587 is half the battle (yeah, read the docs mike:). Getting it to work from the office with even more restrictive firewalls is another thing - but are we actually going to stop devs from being able to send mail without going through the gentoo server, or is this still just a discussion (vs an impending action)? --
-----o()o---------------------------------------------- Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E -----o()o----------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
