> And this is the point: Your definition of 'works' is (in my eyes) at > least sloppy. If it doesn't work for all sensible cases, it shouldn't > be labelled as 'works'. Does "dirty portage-specific hack" mean "That's my bulletproof solution for that problem"? I didn't mean that and I hope that's obvious.
> This is why we discourage bugreports w/p prior contact on IRC. And I discourage saying "doesn't work" w/o saying what is specifically not working esp. if the goal, at the first glance, is reached. It leads nowhere and is just stupid. "It's not safe, don't you ever do it plz!" would be much better if you for example don't have time to give the details. -- Piotr Jaroszyński Gentoo Developer -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
