Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> - Create a new list ("gentoo-core-announce" ?)
> Reading: dev-only
> Posting: dev-only, reply-to set to gentoo-core
> This is the reference list of things (policy, decisions and discussions
> in progress) all developers must know about.Agree with -(core|dev)-announce. > - Keep -core and -dev, as non-required reading Agree, but with the caveat that devs must still be at least subscribed to -core even if they choose not to read it. This way, you could have a -dev-announce that also refers to something private on -core if need be. > Now, do we really need it to be -core-announce? Not really. In fact, > at one point we'd come up with both a -core-announce and a > -dev-announce, with -core-announce being for more sensitive information. I'm having a tough time thinking of sensitive information that all devs must know about (i.e., that would qualify for -core-announce). Thanks, Donnie
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
