* Stuart Herbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > On 6/25/06, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >This topic has come up in the past, and I'd like to revive it once > >again. The gentoo-dev list has gotten a lower and lower signal to noise > >ratio over the past year or two, and it's difficult to dig out the stuff > >that's truly required reading. > > What's noise to you is signal to others. For example, my interest is > servers, so all of your X.org posts are mostly noise to me, but to > others it's essential signal. Same goes for the scientific re-org > recently discussed. And I'm sure the same goes for PHP & webapp > stuff.
ACK. So it seems more worth, splitting off several larger topics, ie. X.org development to separate lists, or even better discuss things that are not really gentoo specific (ie. bug-fixing within the package) on the upstream's list(s). (At this point, I'd like to remind you on my distro independent QM project ...) > >I propose that all need-to-know announcements and decisions be posted to > >a separate, moderated (or restricted posting) gentoo-dev-announce list > >to ensure that no developers lose track of what really matters. > > I think a -dev-announce ML is a good idea, with reply-to set to -dev. ACK. Such an list could be useful. *BUT*: it doesn't make any sense just talking about it. Simply do it or forget it. Only talking is nonsense. If I was admin @gentoo.org, I would have set it up even before writing this mail. cu -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/ fax: +49 36207 519932 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cellphone: +49 174 7066481 --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- DSL ab 0 Euro. -- statische IP -- UUCP -- Hosting -- Webshops -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
