On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:14:02 -0400 Daniel Ostrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One thing I do ask...Lets all start now getting used to calling the > "portage tree" something different. I'm all for terms like "the tree" or > "the ebuild tree" or "the package tree" but at this point, given the > prompting subject matter, the idea of it being a tree which belongs to > portage seems outdated. This may seem like a small thing (like the teams > vs. herds argument that has been brought up countless times before) but > it is the silly little things like this that really do lower the mental > bar for new and exciting things to happen. On related note, why "virtual/portage" ? Why not "virtual/packagemanager", or something like that? -- Andrej "Ticho" Kacian <ticho at gentoo dot org> Gentoo Linux Developer - net-mail, antivirus, sound, x86
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
