Stephen Bennett wrote: > On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 19:04:39 -0400 > Luis Francisco Araujo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I like the idea. This would be some kind of portage-tree standard? >> > > This would be, in essence, a formal definition of the layout of the > tree, and the format of and assumptions made by every file contained > within it. > Thanks, i do like the idea. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
- [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree: a proto-GLEP. Stephen Bennett
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree: a proto-GLE... Luis Francisco Araujo
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree: a proto... Stephen Bennett
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree: a p... Luca Barbato
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree:... Henrik Brix Andersen
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree: a p... Luis Francisco Araujo
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree: a proto... Daniel Ostrow
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree: a p... Alec Warner
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree:... Luca Barbato
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree: a p... Andrej Kacian
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree: a p... Chris Gianelloni
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree: a proto-GLE... Marius Mauch
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree: a proto-GLE... Robin H. Johnson
- Re: [gentoo-dev] Defining the Tree: a proto-GLE... Mike Frysinger