Marius Mauch wrote: > On Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:32:55 +1100 > Ben Skeggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >>Anyway, the most important reason for the GLEP (IMO) is giving AT's >>r/o access to CVS. When working on bugs, it's always fun to find out >>that the problem has already been resolved and just hasn't made it to >>your local rsync mirror yet.. > > > Out of curiosity, what's the more important aspect of r/o cvs: > - more up to date
Not necessarily true. We would not have the anon cvs access from our primary cvs server. It would be synced on a regular basis to a separate box. The newer cvs (which isn't on lark yet) may give us capabilities to have a more 'live' cvs anon system. But as of now, the best infra can provide is 30 minute updates. I don't want to poll the cvs more than that to keep down the load. > - easier selective updates Yup, that's definitely a plus. -- Lance Albertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Infrastructure | Operations Manager --- GPG Public Key: <http://www.ramereth.net/lance.asc> Key fingerprint: 0423 92F3 544A 1282 5AB1 4D07 416F A15D 27F4 B742 ramereth/irc.freenode.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
